Our approach
Start with the work.
Build what fits.
Useful AI integration starts with how your business operates: its tools, design rules, deliverables, and the people who review the work.
Your process defines the solution.
XDYN combines AI assistance, repeatable automation, and clear review steps around a specific engineering need. The aim is a workflow your team can understand, evaluate, and use.
Understand the current workflow.
Map the inputs, repeated tasks, software, and handoffs. Identify the bottleneck and agree on what a useful improvement would look like.
Define a focused pilot.
Choose a bounded task, representative examples, and acceptance criteria. Document which decisions follow fixed rules and which require engineering review.
Build and review the outputs.
Develop the workflow, exercise it with agreed examples, and review its results with your team. Use the findings to refine the automation.
Hand over and improve.
Document operation, inputs, outputs, and review points. Agree on how the workflow will be maintained and where the next improvement belongs.
The first engagement
Bring one recurring engineering task.
It might be configuring a family of parts, building a drawing package, or moving engineering information between tools.
Useful starting material
- A representative part, assembly, drawing, or document
- The inputs and outputs involved
- Your software environment and design constraints
- The repeated steps and review criteria
Potential deliverables
- A workflow map and a scoped automation opportunity
- A working pilot with agreed example cases
- Scripts, templates, or integrations defined by the project
- An operating guide and a handoff plan
Common questions
A few things to know.
Can we start with a single workflow?
Yes. A focused pilot gives you something concrete to evaluate before expanding into a larger integration.
Do we need to replace our existing tools?
The starting point is your current environment. The initial review identifies what can be automated within those tools and where integration is needed.
Who approves the engineering output?
Your team's design rules and acceptance criteria guide the workflow. Engineering approval remains with the people responsible for the design.
See an illustration
Make the change visible.
Explore a simple part-geometry sequence. It is an illustrative example of how a design change can be communicated, rather than a live engineering solver.
Explore the demo